Cash value of welfare spending to households in poverty greater than median...

Cash value of welfare spending to households in poverty greater than median household income



A new analysis of Congressional Research Service data by the  Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee shows that the amount spent on  federal means-tested welfare programs, if converted to cash payments and divided  among households below the poverty line, would equal a daily income greater than  the median household income in 2011.

The cash value of welfare spending, according to the analysis, is $167.65  daily per household in poverty. The median household income in 2011 was $50,054  or $137.13 per day, according to the analysis, released Friday.

When broken down into an hourly wage, welfare spending would be enough for  $30.60 an hour for 40 hour weeks for each household in poverty. The median  household hourly wage is $25.03, which drops to between $21.50 and $23.45 after  federal taxes, depending on deductions and filing status, the minority side of  the committee showed. The wage is further reduced with local and state taxes. Benefits from government assistance programs, they note, are not taxed federally.

In 2011, means-tested  federal welfare spending was government’s largest budget item. Federal  spending on the 83 programs reached $745.84 billion, a number greater than  spending on Social Security, Medicare, non-war defense, among others. When combined with state spending on  federal assistance programs, the total spend reached approximately $1.03  trillion.

“The diffuse and overlapping nature of federal welfare spending has led to  some confusion regarding the scope and nature of benefits,” they write.

As an example of the lack of understanding, the Republican side of the Budget  Committee notes that Newark Mayor Cory Booker with his “Food Stamp Challenge,” attempting to live on  about $30 for a week is an inaccurate demonstration of what it is like to live  on the one of the fastest growing welfare programs in the country, the  Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps.

“The situation Booker presents, however, is not accurate: a low-income  individual on food stamps may qualify for $25,000 in various forms of welfare  support from the federal government on top of his or her existing income and  resources — including access to 15 different food assistance programs,” they  write. “Further, even if one unrealistically assumes that no other welfare  benefits are available, the size of the food stamp benefit increases as one’s  income decreases, as the benefit is designed as a supplement to existing  resources; it is explicitly not intended to be the sole source of funds for purchasing food.”

The minority side of the committee adds that President Barack Obama’s fiscal  year 2013 budget proposal would see means-tested spending increase another 30  percent over the next four years.



  1. Wow! I need to see…if this will work for me…(Joking) I get less than $375.00 per month on disability and sure could use the extra money (joking). I gotta look this up, cause if it's true…even I must object to this. It's just far too liberal, for this liberal…But seriously: I will be the first to admit that assistance programs need trimming…but $167.65 per day per household in poverty is outragous…

  2. Unfortunately, there are extremely serious faults with the assumptions and methodology used to come to this conclusion – starting with the fact that all the spending doesn't go to people below the poverty line.

    Seriously, while I strongly believe in impending doom if entitlement spending isn't curbed, the spreading of inaccurate propaganda such as this hardly furthers the conservative cause.