Obama Logic – Judge Rules Border Fence May Discriminate Against Minorities

Obama Logic – Judge Rules Border Fence May Discriminate Against Minorities


551 border fence discriminates 2 600

Things haven’t gotten to the point yet that Americans are flooding our southern border in an attempt to flee the repression at home, so for now, the traffic is all incoming.

Our southern border is a gateway to Latin America, not Africa, China or Europe. Therefore, we will have largely Hispanic border crashers. Geography doesn’t discriminate, it’s just a reality.

The latest effort to find any kernel of legitimacy upon which to base an argument against defending America from the invasion has just been given a boost by a Federal District Court Judge.

Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, has ruled that a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border could possibly discriminate against local border residents. She put it as having a “disparate impact on lower-income minority communities.” In her ruling she instructed DHS to supply contact information of local local farmers to the plaintiff, Denise Gilman.

Denise Gilman is a clinical professor at the University of Texas-Austin. She has taken it upon herself to conduct research into the “human rights impact” that erecting a fence would have. A fence would certainly have a negative impact on the “human rights” of terrorists, drug smugglers and illegal aliens.

A 2006 federal law has ordered the building of 700 miles of fence along America’s southern border. That law has to this point been largely ignored.

As part of her activism disguised as a research project, Gilman claims she needs to question the landowners in the planned construction areas, to gain insight into the impact the fencing will have on them.

Gilman sued to get the data, which the feds had refused to turn over. In most communities the land ownership information is a public record so it is curious that this is a point of contention at all.

The point should be moot, Gilman’s research project and the local identities are irrelevant. The federal government is and has been destroying farmers throughout California in the name of protecting a bait fish, the delta smelt.

Now a Judge has the nerve to entertain the premise that our border should be wide open for the sake of border farmers, when the situation fits their agenda. Many of the farmers affected in California are Hispanic also, as are many of the workers.

The issue of protecting and securing our borders is unrelated to the identity of those who would seek to violate them. Aside from terrorists, an illegal alien is an illegal alien, period. It also should not matter who the farmers are that hold land upon which the fence would be built or the impact on their property.

Eminent domain was created, not as an abusive tool through which to increase a local tax base, but for situations such as this.

Judge Howell issued a 37-page ruling which indicated that she saw merit in the discrimination argument. If discrimination is the obstacle preventing the construction of the 700 miles of border fence, there is an easy solution.

In the interest of fairness, expand the fence project to cover the entire 2,000 mile southern border.  Construction could begin immediately with the 700 miles already approved and Congress could approve funding to complete the other 1,300 miles in the near future. Then everything along the fence route will be equal, regardless of income level or ethnic group.

Equality is after all, the objective of the socialists in control, so they should be quite satisfied with this resolution. Then again, the result would be a border fence and border security. They can’t have that.

Rick Wells is a conservative Constitutionalist author who contributes to conservative media outlets. “Like” him on Facebook and “Follow” him on Twitter.

Christian American, Patriot Conservative Activist Blogger, Political Pundit 2nd Amendment Rights, Animal Lover, Fashion guru and CEO of Conservative Lady.


  1. this is why activists should never be allowed to be judges. no matter what side of an argument you stand EVERYONE is entited to an IMPARTIAL ruling. I would even include judges who are activists but on my side of an argument, fair is fair and that wouldn't be a fair ruling. any judge who has strong opinions on an issue should excuse himself from ruling on anything to do with that issue

  2. There is nothing to judge. The fence there is designed to discriminate between Americans and Non-Americans. I say back to the Regan era…instead of fence…land-mines.

  3. it,s also against the freedom to travel and the civil rights act of 1964….and all the federal law is tyranny and treason….read this… and you will see why!!!! no lie, documentation beats presentation all day everyday…..fire her and all the feds, let me tell you why!

    the hole federal laws should be repealed… fire them all…. they are treasonous officials. let me tell you why, many have to read this because the more that understand this the faster we can fire the feds….it is treason, the IRS, TSA, Traffic court, etc… it is all treason… let me define it for you….we don't want all of them… they are committing treason to the united states, and they all should be fired… don't believe read this and let me define it for you, TREASON {to any act that manifest a betrayal of allegiance to the united states!} why, stand up for treasonous acts… Now let me defend it for you with simplicity, in-case you cant seem to see the definition..and have fear to stand up for truth.. spread it, teach it, learn it, live it, defend it…. Here is the definition of it all, so you can see why people question it, and cant seem to put the finger on what is going on! And they grow up in a free country with ought being educated on the truths of freedom and law… they learn federal law which is a traps of slavery, let me give you it in simplicity….look at this and defined it for yourself! TREASON {to any act that manifest a betrayal of allegiance to the united states!}
    so that means putting federal laws that infringe the rights of the people, and making laws from a entity that is not allowed by or to the federal government, which is illegal because they swear to the oath to uphold, defend, preserve and protect against foreign and domestic. by the 10th amendment! because the federal law is foreign to the constitution and became domestic to the nation and they all let it be like that?………read my lips…….. read the tenth amendment…… TREASON {to any act that manifest a betrayal of allegiance to the united states!} ………………………………………………………………………………………
    1.allegiance: loyalty or commitment of a subordinate to a superior or of an individual to a group or cause. which is us and ( the constitution is superior to them..)

    2.manifest: readily perceived by the eye or the understanding; evident; obvious; apparent; plain: a manifest error.( making the federal law and using this federal system and judges to infringe our rights, they obviously deceived us.)

    3.Betrayal: is the breaking or violation of a presumptive contract, trust, or confidence that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals, between organizations or between individuals and organizations.( they violated their oath….)
    they swear to an oath!
    to protect, defend and to preserve against foreign or domestic..
    foreign: of, from, in, or characteristic of a country or language other than one's own.( the federal laws are foreign to the constitution!)

    domestic: existing or occurring or occurring inside a particular country………….. (They open federal offices and buildings here)

    AND THIS IS NOT EVEN ADDING THE REST OF THE DEFINITION TO YOUR LOGIC. and when you look at the tenth it states….10th, (Amendment X)..(BILL OF RIGHTS)………………….. ……………………THE TENTH SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND……………………..
    The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is the Supreme law and is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791.[1] The Tenth Amendment states the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that ( powers not granted to the federal government) by the Constitution, (nor prohibited to the States), are reserved to the States) or (the people)………….. plain and to the point.(are reserved to the States) means us the people as a group, and or the people….. which is a person standing on his own! Fire the feds….. and (not granted to the federal government!)….no federal law is a law!……………… ……………….. it says it, in Black and white and it is the SUPREME LAW, which, I will Defend and follow! again Fire the feds……Documentation beats presentation all day ………………………………………….everyday, so adding the Second and the 14th….. how would you define it other than treason?
    "a language" so federal law is fa foreign language to the constitution!

  4. What nobody seems to consider is that when whites become a minority, in another 25 years because of the increase in the hispanic population, why wouldn’t this country become exactly like South America? Where hispanic majority rule currently exists? In every country in South America you can do pretty much whatever you want as long as you pat off the police: Corruption, crime, poverty. This isn’t racist to presume, it’s completely logical. Is Canada anything like the countries in South America? We have to secure our borders to secure our way of life. Waiting until whites are a minority is too late.